Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Perdue v. Ohio State Highway Patrol et al
as 1:2014cv00967
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Perdue
Defendant:
Ohio State Highway Patrol, Keith Fellure, Inspector General of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Ohio, State of
as 1:2014cv00899
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Martin, III,r
Defendant:
Ohio, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. Ohio State of et al
as 1:2014cv00365
Plaintiff:
Brad A. Bradford
Defendant:
Ohio State of, Robinson, Freed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Ohio State of et al
as 2:2014cv00462
Plaintiff:
Brad A. Bradford
Defendant:
Ohio State of, Robinson, Freed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rahe v. Toledo Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2014cv00278
Petitioner:
D'Marcell Rahe
Defendant:
Toledo Correctional Institution and Ohio State University Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Eye Physician's and Surgeons Clinic et al
as 1:2013cv02829
Plaintiff:
Ali Gill
Defendant:
Eye Physician's and Surgeons Clinic, Ohio State University Medical Center, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Director OSU Hospital et al
as 1:2013cv02395
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Williams
Defendant:
Director OSU Hospital and Ohio State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baez v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00856
Plaintiff:
Santos Baez
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections and Ohio State University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ganaway v. Ohio, State of
as 1:2013cv00833
Plaintiff:
Clarence Ganaway
Defendant:
Ohio, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Napier v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary et al
as 1:2012cv00163
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Napier
Defendant:
Warden Ohio State Penitentiary, Dale Knowles, Martin Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
