Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Jones v. Oklahoma County Jail et al
as 5:2015cv00152
Plaintiff:
Christopher Addarryl Jones
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail, Oklahoma Fugitive Task Squad and Oklahoma County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Childs et al
as 5:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
Sam Roy Love, Jr
Defendant:
Dr Childs, Oklahoma County Jail and John Wetsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Truelove, et al
as 13-6072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LYNN HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARKUS TRUELOVE, Officer, Oklahoma County Jail, ANDREAS SANCHEZ, Sergeant and JACOB STREETER
Love v. Oklahoma County Jail et al
as 5:2011cv00675
Plaintiff:
Sam Roy Love, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail and John Whetsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dockins v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2010cv00934
Plaintiff:
Glenn Dockins
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma County Jail, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Oklahoma County Jail et al
as 5:2009cv00528
Plaintiff:
Billie West
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail and Oklahoma County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Oklahoma County Detention Center et al
as 5:2008cv00690
Plaintiff:
Tori Quintrell Hill
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Detention Center, Oklahoma County Jail, Ryan Icer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams v. Whitehorn et al
as 5:2008cv00558
Plaintiff:
Miguel A Adams
Defendant:
Corporal Whitehorn and Oklahoma County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mayes v. Oklahoma County Jail et al
as 5:2007cv00918
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mayes
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail and Lexington Assessment & Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Oklahoma County Jail et al
as 4:2007cv00437
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mayes
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Jail and Lexington Assessment & Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
