Cases 21 - 30 of 36
May v. Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2012cv02184
Plaintiff:
Benita May
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Holder v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 3:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
Janice Holder
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bailey v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2011cv02344
Plaintiff:
Beverly Bailey
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hurd v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 2:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hurd
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Loy et al
as 3:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Anita Claiborne Loy , Kimberly K Claiborne , Donald H Claiborne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Parker v. Mutual of Omaha et al
as 1:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
Tammy E Parker
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schoonover v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2010cv00252
Plaintiff:
Diane Schoonover
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suttles v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co. et al
as 1:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Suttles
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Ins. Co. , Psychiatric Solutions, Inc and Scott Coleman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Green et al v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 2:2010cv02487
Plaintiff:
Pearlie M. Green and Gregory A. Burks
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. United Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 3:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lane
Defendant:
United Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
