Cases 21 - 29 of 29
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al v. MURDOCK et al
as 1:2010cv05360
Plaintiff:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Defendant:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK , MURDOCK and JOSEPH VETERI, ESQ.
Cross_claimant:
JOSEPH VETERI, ESQ. , PRUDENTIAL FOX & ROACH REALTORS and Zucker Goldberg & Ackerman
Cross_defendant:
ABC through XYZ CORPORATIONS, CITIMORTGAGE , EAST COAST MORTGAGE CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
McCabe Weisberg & Conway , Zucker Goldberg & Ackerman , Erica Johnson-Seck and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK
Counter_claimant:
CRYSTAL MURDOCK
Counter_defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
BOSTICK v. ONE WEST BANK et al
as 2:2010cv05278
Plaintiff:
RAYNA BOSTICK
Defendant:
ONE WEST BANK and LPS FIELD SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
One West Bank, FSB v. Barry
as 3:2010cv01882
Plaintiff:
One West Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Kathy Barry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
One West Bank, FSB v. Cohen et al
as 3:2010cv01074
Plaintiff:
One West Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Adam Cohen and Mahagany Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
One West Bank, FSB v. Salazar
as 3:2010cv00602
Plaintiff:
One West Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Maria Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
One West Bank, FSB v. Bennett et al
as 3:2010cv00536
Plaintiff:
One West Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Violet Bennett and Nadine Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
One West Bank, FSB v. Derival et al
as 3:2010cv00526
Plaintiff:
One West Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Moy Derival and Maurice Derival
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
One West Bank, FSB v. Brickey et al
as 3:2009cv02500
Plaintiff:
One West Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Gary D Brickey and Debra C Brickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
One West Bank, FSB v. Ahumada et al
as 3:2009cv02102
Plaintiff:
One West Bank, FSB
Defendant:
Gilberto Ahumada and Maria P Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
