Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Admiral Insurance Company v. Pearson et al
as 5:2023cv01115
Plaintiff:
Admiral Insurance Company
Defendant:
Aaron Wayne Pearson, Leandra Lynn Pearson, ONEOK Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
United States of America v. Spencer et al
as 4:2020cv00556
Defendant:
City of Owasso, Oklahoma, Charles W Spencer, Tulsa County, Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ONEOK, INC v. Rhine et al
as 6:2013cv00341
Plaintiff:
ONEOK, Inc.
Defendant:
David Scott Rhine, Freddie D. Coats, World Wide Inspection, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Retirement Plan for the Employees of ONEOK, Inc. and Subsidiaries, The v. Green
as 4:2010cv00389
Plaintiff:
Retirement Plan for the Employees of ONEOK, Inc. and Subsidiaries, The
Defendant:
Brenda L. Green
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ONEOK, Inc. v. Micro Focus (US) Inc.
as 4:2009cv00614
Plaintiff:
ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK, Inc.
Defendant:
Micro Focus (US) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
ONEOK, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00597
Plaintiff:
ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK, Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
