Cases 1 - 10 of 388
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. v. Mitchell, et al.
as 24-2379
Plaintiff:
OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC.
Defendant:
STEVEN MITCHELL, DORI MITCHELL, JEROME HOPPER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Polishchuk v. Makowenskyj et al
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dimitry Polishchuk
Defendant:
Michael Makowenskyj, Christopher Lazos, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. and others
Feldsher v. Makowenskyj et al
as 1:2023cv09191
Defendant:
Michael Makowenskyj, Michael Mak, Parlor Games, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ross Feldsher
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud
Roe, et al. v. Critchfield, et al.
as 23-2807
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBECCA ROE, by and through her parents and next friends, RYAN ROE, RACHEL ROE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBBIE CRITCHFIELD, in her official capacity as Idaho State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LINDA CLARK, in their official capacities as members of the Idaho State Board of Education, WILLIAM G. GILBERT, JR., in their official capacities as members of the Idaho State Board of Education and others
Panovski v. Inpixon et al
as 3:2023cv04330
Plaintiff:
Orlin Panovski
Defendant:
Inpixon, Nadir Ali, Kareem M. Irfan and others
Busby v. Inpixon et al
as 3:2023cv04249
Plaintiff:
Daniel Busby
Defendant:
Inpixon, Nadir Ali, Kareem M. Irfan and others
Wieder v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07406
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Wieder
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Robert McDonald and others
Floyd v. Quotient Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Floyd
Defendant:
Quotient Technology, Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
Smith v. Quotient Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07068
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Quotient Technology Inc., Matthew Krepsik, Kimberly Anstett and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
