Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States v. Whitehead
as 24-6062
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
OTIS RAY WHITEHEAD, JR.
United States v. Ponds
as 22-3126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
OTIS PONDS
United States v. Hunsaker
as 22-7016
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL OTIS HUNSAKER, JR.
Brick v. Darnell et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Tisha Brick
Defendant:
Elaine Darnell, Kendra Otis, Lee Widner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ace American Insurance Company et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 4:2022mc00006
Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Company, Zurich American Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and others
In Re:
Subpoena Ad Testificandum Issued to Thomas M. Sing
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Brick v. Estancia Municipal School, et al
as 21-2042
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIELLE TRUJILLO, Social Worker contracted at Estancia Municipal School District, MARTHA WARD, Principal at Estancia Municipal School District, LEONA SEGURA, Occupational Therapist contracted at Estancia Municipal School District and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TISHA BRICK, and A.B.
Eyre et al v. Lemmel et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Defendant:
Tara Lemmel, Otis Carroll, Jr Floyd T. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod LaMar, Luke B. Eyre, Nathan D. Nearman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Otis v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 2:2018cv00213
Plaintiff:
Elbert Otis
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank and Allied Interstate
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
XMission v. OTI Productions
as 2:2017cv01298
Plaintiff:
XMission
Defendant:
OTI Productions
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 7701
In re: Morris, et al
as 15-1362
Petitioner:
JOHN OTIS MORRIS
Respondent:
BRIAN (I) BURNETT, Acting Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
