Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Redden v. United States of America
as 24-87
Petitioner:
JEFFREY OTIS REDDEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Biggers v. The State of Texas
as 23-7784
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRENESHA BIGGERS
Plaintiff:
M.F., A minor and Z.S., A minor
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF TEXAS, NEW YORK ACS, EL PASO CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
Linares v. Annucci
as 21-2839
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jorge L. Linares
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony Annucci, as Acting Commissioner for the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Tina M. Stanford, as Chairwoman of the New York State Board of Parole, Walter W. Smith, a member of the Board and others
United States of America v. Parkes
as 21-1324
Defendant / Appellant:
Otis Parkes
Appellee:
United States of America
Messer v. Cioppa et al
as 1:2021cv02525
Defendant:
Thomas M Cioppa, Alejandro N. Mayorkas and Acting Director Tracy Renaud
Plaintiff:
Warren Otis Messer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Daniel v. T&M Protection Resources, LLC
as 21-858
Defendant:
Universal Protection Service and Edward J. Minskoff Equities, Inc
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Otis A. Daniel
Defendant / Appellee:
T&M Protection Resources, LLC
United States of America v. Thompson
as 21-124
Defendant:
Deloyd Lesane, AKA Chop, Benjamin Otis, AKA B.O., AKA B and Casey Oakes, AKA Ratchet
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeremy Thompson, AKA J
Bianco et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv10902
Plaintiff:
Maureen Reed, Winsome Nelson Reid, Doris McCloud and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Redden v. United States of America
as 20-2983
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Otis Redden
United States of America v. Redden
as 20-2624
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeffrey Otis Redden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
