Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Parker v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00702
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
Mr. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00665
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallman v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HALLMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN OTIS SMITH, JONES and SABRINA PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grullon v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
Victor Grullon
Respondent:
Otis Wilson and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hallmon v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hallman and Derrick Hallmon
Defendant:
Warden Otis Smith, Captain Jones and Sabrina Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Dionna Young
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company, ABC Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
PUGH v. MIMS
as 4:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
OTIS WADE PUGH, SR
Respondent:
Warden CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Otis Elevator International, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05068
Plaintiff:
Cathy Hunter
Defendant:
Northside Hospital, Inc., Otis Elevator International, Inc., Otis Elevator Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lynch Land Holdings LLC et al v. Pergam
as 1:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
Lynch Land Holdings LLC and Otis Burney, Jr
Defendant:
John JP Pergam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
