Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Otis Berthey, Jr. v. Gary Sandor, et al
as 11-55513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS TELBERT BERTHEY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY SANDOR, Warden, A. HUNTSPON, Fac. 3 Captain, T. DEMASEE, Counselor One and others
Otis Telbert Berthey Jr. v. Gary Sandor et al
as 2:2010cv09636
Petitioner:
Otis Telbert Berthey, Jr
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown and Gary Sandor
Otis Telbert Berthey Jr v. Gary Sandor et al
as 5:2010cv01462
Defendant:
Berberrich, T Demasee, D Foston and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Telbert Berthey, Jr
Otis Berthey, Jr. v. Matthew Martel, et al
as 09-56217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS TELBERT BERTHEY, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW MARTEL, Warden and G. KERSTTETTER, DDS Chief Dental Officer
Otis Telbert Berthey Jr v. Matthew Martel et al
as 5:2009cv01464
Plaintiff:
Otis Telbert Berthey, Jr
Defendant:
Matthew Martel and G Kersttetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Otis Telbert Berthey v. Matthew Martel et al
as 5:2009cv01301
Plaintiff:
Otis Telbert Berthey, Jr
Defendant:
Matthew Martel and G Kersttetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Otis Berthey, Jr. v. Guillermina Hall
as 09-55223
Petitioner - Appellant:
OTIS TELBERT BERTHEY, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
GUILLERMINA HALL, Warden
Otis Telbert Berthey, Jr v. Matthew Martel et al
as 5:2007cv01153
Plaintiff:
Otis Telbert Berthey, Jr
Defendant:
Matthew Martel, D Turner, P Osbey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berthey v. Martel et al
as 3:2007cv01674
Plaintiff:
Otis Telbert Berthey, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew Martel, D Turner and P. Osbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berthey v. Hall
as 3:2007cv00964
Petitioner:
Otis Telbert Berthey, Jr.
Respondent:
Guillermina Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
