Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States of America v. 27,500.00 In U.S. Currency, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv03447
Defendant: 27,500.00 In U.S. Currency, One 14K Gold Men s Ring, Seven One-Ounce Gold Bars and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
USA v. United States Postal Service Priority Mail parcel, is a blue and white United States Postal Service Priority Mail Flat Rate cardboard box weighing approximately 5 ounces, postmarked on January 15, 20
as 2:2011mj01021
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: United States Postal Service Priority Mail parcel, is a blue and white United States Postal Service Priority Mail Flat Rate cardboard box weighing approximately 5 ounces, postmarked on January 15, 20 (1)
USA v. United States Postal Service Priority Mail parcel, is a blue and white United States Postal Service Priority Mail Flat Rate cardboard box weighing approximately 6 ounces, postmarked on February 19, 20
as 2:2011mj01020
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: United States Postal Service Priority Mail parcel, is a blue and white United States Postal Service Priority Mail Flat Rate cardboard box weighing approximately 6 ounces, postmarked on February 19, 20 (1)
United States Postal Service Priority Mail parcel, is a blue and white United States Postal Service Priority Mail Flat Rate cardboard box weighing approximately 5 ounces, postmarked on January 15, 20
as 2:2011mj01021
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: United States Postal Service Priority Mail parcel, is a blue and white United States Postal Service Priority Mail Flat Rate cardboard box weighing approximately 5 ounces, postmarked on January 15, 20 (1)
United States Postal Service Priority Mail parcel, is a blue and white United States Postal Service Priority Mail Flat Rate cardboard box weighing approximately 6 ounces, postmarked on February 19, 20
as 2:2011mj01020
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: United States Postal Service Priority Mail parcel, is a blue and white United States Postal Service Priority Mail Flat Rate cardboard box weighing approximately 6 ounces, postmarked on February 19, 20 (1)
United States of America v. Approximately $26,851.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2009cv02222
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $26,851.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $70,700.00 in U.S. Currency, 21 One-Ounce Gold Coins and 28 One-Ounce Silver Coins valued at approximately $19,236.00 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Approximately $26,851.00 in U.S. Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02223
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $26,851.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $70,700.00 in U.S. Currency, 21 One-Ounce Gold Coins and 28 One-Ounce Silver Coins valued at approximately $19,236.00 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $13,000.00 In U.S. Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv04797
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $13,000.00 In U.S. Currency, $8,721.93 In Bank Funds, 200 One-Troy Ounce Silver Leaf Canadian $5 Coins and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Approximately $7,236.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2008at00930
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $7,236.00 in U.S. Currency, Two (2) $1,000.00 MoneyGram International Money Orders and Sixty Eight (68) one-ounce gold bars
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Approximately $7,236.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2008cv01905
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $7,236.00 in U.S. Currency, Two (2) $1,000.00 MoneyGram International Money Orders and Sixty Eight (68) one-ounce gold bars
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?