Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
OWENS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2018cv04522
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
KEVIN OWENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford et al v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, et al.
as 2:2018cv02582
Plaintiff:
Ashley T. Ford , DAVID WEST , Marisa Burns and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and Elisabeth DeVos
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SULLIVAN v. ARCONIC INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01213
Plaintiff:
JANET L. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
ARCONIC INC., KLAUS KLEINFELD, ROBERT S. COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
KEESEE et al v. DOUGHERTY et al
as 2:2016cv05422
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY, THOMAS RODRIGUEZ, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION 98 and others
Plaintiff:
KEESEE, MCON ELECTRIC, LLC and JOSHUA KEESEE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
OWENS et al v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC
as 2:2014cv01148
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. OWENS and DONNA OWENS
Defendant:
RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BANGS et al v. JP INTERMODAL HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2014cv00670
Plaintiff:
JOHN BANGS, JR. , WILLIS BROOKS , DANIEL CRAFT and others
Defendant:
JP INTERMODAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHUYLKILL HEALTH SYSTEM v. CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07065
Plaintiff:
SCHUYLKILL HEALTH SYSTEM
Defendant:
CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and OWENS & MINOR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
