Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC, et al v. NLRB
as 19-1090
Undetermined:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and OZBURN-HESSEY LOGISTICS, LLC
Intervenor:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC
Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC v. NLRB
as 19-1054
Undetermined:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and OZBURN-HESSEY LOGISTICS, LLC
Intervenor:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO/CLC
M. McKinney v. Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC
as 15-5211
Petitioner - Appellee:
M. KATHLEEN MCKINNEY, Regional Director of Region 15 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent - Appellant:
OZBURN-HESSEY LOGISTICS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McKinney v. Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC
as 2:2014cv02445
Petitioner:
M. Kathleen McKinney
Respondent:
Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Hooks v. Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC
as 2:2010cv02609
Plaintiff:
Ronald K. Hooks
Defendant:
Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC v. Eden Surgical Center
as 3:2010cv00228
Plaintiff:
Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Eden Surgical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
