Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rangel et al v. P&P Exponelli LLC
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Khatyuska Rangel, Eloy Mendoza and Tatiana Andrade
Defendant:
P&P Exponelli LLC, P&P Exponelli LLC Florida limited liability corporation doing business as WEGT2U and Paulo Amaral Neto
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 Fair Labor Standards Act - Maximum Hours
Rangel et al v. Andrade et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Khatyuska Rangel and Eloy Mendoza
Defendant:
Tatiana Andrade and P&P Exponelli LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act - Denial of Overtime Compensation
Portillo v. P & P Amoco, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05594
Plaintiff:
Cristian Garcia Portillo
Defendant:
P & P Amoco, Inc. and Tomy Philip
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christy v. P & P Logistical Services, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00379
Plaintiff:
Thomas Christy
Defendant:
P & P Logistical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Christy v. P & P Logistical Services, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00373
Plaintiff:
Thomas Christy
Defendant:
P & P Logistical Services, Inc.
Christy v. P & P Logistical Services, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00376
Plaintiff:
Thomas Christy
Defendant:
P & P Logistical Services, Inc.
Christy v. P & P Logistical Services, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00375
Plaintiff:
Thomas Christy
Defendant:
P & P Logistical Services, Inc.
QUINTANA v. P & P FAMILY AUTO RENTAL CORP. et al
as 1:2019cv20251
Defendant:
DIANA ALVAREZ, DIANA M. JIJON, RICARDO ALVAREZ and others
Plaintiff:
FELIX LAZARO DE JESUS QUINTANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bricklayers Insurance And Welfare Fund et al v. P&P Fireproofing, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01367
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers Local 1, Bricklayers Pension Fund, International Masonry Institute and others
Defendant:
P&P Fireproofing, Inc. and Willie Powell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
