Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hughes v. Maney et al
as 2:2026cv01809
Plaintiff:
Edward Michael Hughes
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Patrick Maney, Dr. Garth Gulick, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2026cv01749
Plaintiff:
Luis Felipe Gonzalez
Defendant:
Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Oregon Correctional Enterprises, Mr. D. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyles v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2026cv01423
Plaintiff:
Joshua Boyles
Defendant:
Rheannon Morby, Cindy Dieter, Patrick Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Gettmann et al
as 3:2026cv01163
Plaintiff:
Richard James Newell
Defendant:
C. Gettmann, Patrick Maney and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. LeGore, et al.
as 26-3010
Plaintiff:
CRUZ PALACIOS ROMERO
Defendant:
RYAN LEGORE, Superintendent, PATRICK MANEY, Provedor, THOMAS BRISTOL, Provedor and others
Romero v. LeGore, et al.
as 26-2811
Plaintiff:
CRUZ PALACIOS ROMERO
Defendant:
RYAN LEGORE, Superintendent, PATRICK MANEY, Provider, THOMAS BRISTOL, Provider and others
Bonner v. Maney et al
as 2:2026cv00828
Plaintiff:
Joe Cummings Bonner, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Maney and Dr. Ellensburger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marks v. Reyes et al
as 2:2026cv00734
Plaintiff:
Michael Marks
Defendant:
J. Bugher, Ms. E. Reyes, Dr. Snell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farfan v. Roberts et al
as 2:2026cv00523
Plaintiff:
Erik Jovanny Farfan
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Charles Cox, P. Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raber v. Maney et al
as 2:2026cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jeremia Raber
Defendant:
Patrick Maney, Jane Does, Joe Bugher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
