Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Davidson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05383
Defendant:
P.O. Sean Carlton, City of New York, Sgt. James Hensen and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05679
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O.s John Doe #1-10 and Mark Kaufman
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05539
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O.s John Doe #1-10 and P.O. Jamie Santiago
Plaintiff:
Philip Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoyos v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv04033
Defendant:
P.O. Ari Arvon, City of New York, P.O. Scott Harrison and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Hoyos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davison v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03425
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O.s John Doe #1-10 and Angelo Pizzarro
Plaintiff:
Daniel Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv02521
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O.s John Doe #1-10 and P.O. Giancarl Osma
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCalla v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01479
Defendant:
Det. Madelyn Ciprian-Dobles, City of New York, Det. Albert Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Omar McCalla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paxton v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01371
Defendant:
P.O. Michael Cerullo, City of New York and P.O.s John Doe #1-10
Plaintiff:
Troy Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01017
Defendant:
P.O. Jason Arbeeny, City of New York and P.O.s John Doe #1-10
Plaintiff:
Brian Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
