Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Weird Science LLC et al v. Rene Sindlev et al
as 2:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Weird Science LLC and William Anderson Wittekind
Defendant:
Rene Sindlev, Mark Dybul, Gregg Alton and others
Audrey McAdams v. Susan E. Arnold et al
as 2:2023cv10542
Plaintiff:
Audrey McAdams
Defendant:
Susan E. Arnold, Mary T. Barra, Safra A. Catz and others
Hugues Gervat v. Robert Chapek et al
as 2:2023cv06389
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Robert Chapek, Christine M. McCarthy, Kareem Daniel and others
Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawai, et al v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al
as 22-16501
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE STATE OF HAWAII, Lead Plaintiff
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. MULLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, C. ALLEN PARKER, JOHN R. SHREWSBERRY and others
Meinking v. ChemoCentryx, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv05019
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Meinking
Defendant:
ChemoCentryx, Inc., Thomas J. Schall, Thomas A. Edwards and others
Randolph v. Barton et al
as 2:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Michael Blake Randolph
Defendant:
Richard N Barton, Erick Blachford, Amy Bohutinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Sisson v. Barton et al
as 2:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Brian Sisson
Defendant:
Richard N Barton, Erik Blachford, Amy Bohutinsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Napoli et al v. Schall et al
as 4:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Joseph Napoli and ChemoCentryx, Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas J. Schall, Joseph Feczko, Rita Jain and others
Hillier v. Zillow Group Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Aaron Winston Hillier and Sjunde AP-Fonden
Defendant:
Zillow Group, Inc., Richard N Barton, Lloyd D Frink and others
Petitioner:
Slav Danev
Barua v. Zillow Group Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01551
Plaintiff:
Dibakar Barua
Defendant:
Zillow Group, Inc., Richard Barton, Allen Parker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
