Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Digital Licensing Inc. et al
as 3:2023mc02984
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Digital Licensing Inc. a Wyoming corporation doing business as DEBT Box, Jason R. Anderson, Jacob S. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Bey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Bennie Thompson, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00405
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
The Mississippi Bar v. Flechas
as 3:2019ad00010
Interested Party:
David C. Bramlette, III, Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander and others
Respondent:
Eduardo A. Flechas
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Raul v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Raul
Defendant:
Gregory H. Mitchell, Ted E. Parker, J. Douglas Seidenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parker v. Credit One Bank, National Association
as 5:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Paulette Parker
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parker v. Conn Appliances, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00381
Plaintiff:
Don Parker
Defendant:
Conn Appliances, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Parker et al v. Asbestos Processing, LLC et al
as 3:2012mc00419
Plaintiff:
Odell Parker, Ruth Parker and Larry Southern
Defendant:
Asbestos Processing, LLC, Richard H. Bishoff, Richard H. Bishoff, PC and others
Movant:
Crymes G. Pittman and Rance N. Ulmer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
