Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Doc's Dream, LLC v. Dolores Press, Inc., et al
as 18-55487
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
DOC'S DREAM, LLC
Defendant-counter-claim-3rd-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLORES PRESS, INC. and MELISSA SCOTT
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK ROBINSON, TRUTH SEEKERS, INC. and BOBBI JONES
Robinson et al v. Zeruk et al
as 8:2018cv00693
Plaintiff:
Patrick Robinson , Carlos A. Leyva and Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Defendant:
James Zeruk and John Does 1-5, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Doc's Dream, LLC v. Dolores Press, Inc., et al
as 17-56778
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
DOC'S DREAM, LLC
Defendant-counter-claim-3rd-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLORES PRESS, INC. and MELISSA SCOTT
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK ROBINSON, TRUTH SEEKERS, INC. and BOBBI JONES
Dolores Press, Inc., et al v. Patrick Robinson, et al
as 17-55071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLORES PRESS, INC., a California corporation and MELISSA SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK ROBINSON, an individual, TRUTH SEEKERS, INC., a Georgia Corporation, DOCS DREAM, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company and others
Dolores Press, Inc. v. Patrick Robinson, et al
as 17-55069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOLORES PRESS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK ROBINSON, an individual, TRUTH SEEKERS, INC., a Georgia Corporation, DOCS DREAM, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company and others
Dolores Press Inc v. Patrick Robinson
as 2:2016cv01275
Defendant:
Docs Dream, LLC, Does, Patrick Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Dolores Press Inc
Dolores Press, Inc. v. Patrick Robinson et al
as 2:2015cv02562
Defendant:
Docs Dream LLC, Does, Patrick Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Dolores Press, Inc.
Di Modica v. Random House, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv06732
Plaintiff:
Arturo Di Modica and Arturo Di Modica
Defendant:
Random House, Inc., Lawrence G. McDonald and Patrick Robinson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
