Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Gary Baldwin v. David Michael, et al
as 17-1838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY LEE BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT DAVID MICHAEL and PAUL KLEE, Warden
Thomas Snelling v. Paul Klee, et al
as 16-2698
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS R. SNELLING
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL KLEE, Warden, Gus Harrison Correctional Facility, DONALD RICUMSTRICT, Deputy Warden, KENNETH SALISBURY, Deputy Warden and others
Jason Shaver v. Paul Klee
as 16-2696
Petitioner - Appellant:
JASON SHAVER
Respondent - Appellee:
PAUL KLEE, Warden
Joel Carter v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Daniel Heyns, Director, KATHLEEN A. MUTSCHLER, Director, Corrections Mental Health Program, RICK RAYMOND, Western Regional Director, Corrections Mental Health Program and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PSYCHOLOGIST CARRIE MCROBERTS, SURJIT DINSA and JENNIFER PIRLOT, Mental Health Unit Chief
Roosevelt Rupert v. Paul Klee
as 16-2543
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROOSEVELT RUPERT
Respondent - Appellee:
PAUL KLEE, Warden
Hugo Rodriguez v. Paul Klee
as 16-2419
Petitioner - Appellant:
HUGO LOAIZA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
PAUL KLEE, Warden
Raleem-X v. William Borgerding, et al
as 16-2353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALEEM-X
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BORGERDING, Doctor, DONALD E. HAPDEE, O.D., PRISONER COUNSELOR S. KING and others
Raleem-X v. Larry Brown, et al
as 16-2151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALEEM-X
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY BROWN, SIG Coordinator, T. LEE, Corrections Officer Sergeant, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Formal Director and others
Jerome Jones v. Paul Klee
as 16-1889
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEROME FRANCIS JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
PAUL KLEE, Warden
Randle Griffin v. Paul Klee, et al
as 16-1586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDLE GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL KLEE, Warden, ROY VEST, Inspector, JOSEPH BARRETT, Deputy Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
