Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Sweeney v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv14142
Plaintiff:
Michael M Sweeney
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Paul Lawrence Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Sweeney v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv14143
Plaintiff:
Michael M Sweeney
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Paul Lawrence Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Bruner v. LCRF Law Library Staff
as 5:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Bruner
Defendant:
LCRF Law Library Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruner v. United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
as 5:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Bruner
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOLDEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
PAUL LAWRENCE GOLDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bruner v. Lawton Correctional Rehabilitation Facility Staff
as 5:2022cv01104
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Bruner
Defendant:
Lawton Correctional Rehabilitation Facility Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruner v. Cleveland County Courthouse et al
as 5:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Bruner
Defendant:
Cleveland County Courthouse and LCRF Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruner v. LCRF Inmate Trust Fund Staff
as 5:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Bruner
Defendant:
LCRF Inmate Trust Fund Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Bruner v. , et al
as 22-6200
Petitioner:
PAUL LAWRENCE BRUNER
Respondent:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Barnett (ID 86695) v. Wichita Police Department, City of et al
as 5:2022cv03187
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Barnett
Defendant:
Wichita Police Department, City of, Amy McCowen and Kenneth Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
