Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dixon v. Kootenai County Public Safety, et al.
as 1:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Dixon
Defendant:
Kootenai County Public Safety, Kootenai County Sheriff and Andy Peaks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Evans v. Hepworth et al
as 1:2019cv00380
Defendant:
Wanthub, Inc., Treasure Valley Powder Coating, LLC, Luxe Imports, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Evans
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
St. George v. Peak Recovery LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00525
Defendant:
Michonne Pieksma and Peak Recovery LLC
Plaintiff:
Aaron St. George
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois et al v. State of Oregon Department of Forestry et al
as 2:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
State of Oregon Department of Forestry, John Lee Habberstad and China Peak Ranch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Trotter v. Bayview Loan Services et al
as 2:2015cv00301
Plaintiff:
Vermont Trotter
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Services , Bank of New York Mellon, Peak Foreclosure Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mahoney v. Peake
as 4:2008cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Dennis Mahoney
Defendant:
James B. Peake
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peak Asphalt, LLC v. National Fire Insurance Co of Hartford
as 4:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
Peak Asphalt, LLC
Defendant:
National Fire Insurance Co of Hartford
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Citadel Broadcasting Company et al v. Peak Broadcasting, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00203
Plaintiff:
Citadel Broadcasting Company and Citadel Broadcasting Company
Defendant:
Peak Broadcasting, LLC, Peak Broadcasting, LLC, Peak Broadcasting, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
