Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Nguyen et al v. Peak Equity Group LLC et al
as 5:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
David Nguyen, Thao Nguyen and Wynn Wynn Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Peak Equity Group LLC, High Peaks Financial LLC and Paul Sauer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Blue et al v. Chickasha City of
as 5:2020cv01210
Plaintiff:
Duke R Keeling, James C Calhoun, Michael Wise and others
Defendant:
Chickasha City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
King Energy LLC v. Peak Completion Technologies Inc
as 5:2019cv00970
Plaintiff:
King Energy LLC
Defendant:
Peak Completion Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. BVP Bryant Place LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00182
Defendant:
The Community Bryant Place, Peak Campus Management and BVP Bryant Place LLC
Plaintiff:
Litisha Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Verebelyi et al v. Nichols Companies, Inc. The et al
as 4:2017cv00660
Plaintiff:
Joseph Verebelyi and Cindy Verebelyi
Defendant:
Nichols Companies, Inc., The and Peak Methods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peak Methods, Inc. v. Verebelyi et al
as 4:2016cv00493
Plaintiff:
Peak Methods, Inc.
Defendant:
Joseph R Verebelyi and Cindy Verebelyi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burris v. HCR Manor Care et al
as 5:2012cv01228
Plaintiff:
Shirley Burris
Defendant:
HCR Manor Care , Manor Care of Mid-West City-Ok LLC , Sun Healthcare Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wright v. Serrano et al
as 4:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
Lisa Wright
Defendant:
Nathan Serrano , Chris Serrano and Peak Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duke v. Peak Medical Oklahoma No 9 Inc
as 5:2010cv01193
Plaintiff:
Ladonna K Duke
Defendant:
Peak Medical Oklahoma No 9 Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
