Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sasser v. Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01869
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sasser
Defendant:
Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc., David Harris, Hannah Craven and others
Perelman v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:21-CV-03556
Plaintiff:
Perelman
Defendant:
3M Company, The
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06308
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
STM Invest S.a.r.l., et al v. 3P Equity Partners, LLC, et al
as 19-55689
Defendant / Appellant:
LEONID PERELMAN, 3P EQUITY PARTNERS, LLC, AM VENTURES MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STM INVEST S.A.R.L. and AVENTURINE, INC.
Defendant:
SILVER SAIL CAPITAL, LLC and DOES, 1 through 10
Lachman v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02859
Defendant:
Lorenzo Delpani, Wendel F. Kralovich, Juan R. Figuereo and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Lachman
Petitioner:
OOO iK Barna Group
Rubenstein v. vTv Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09752
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rubenstein
Defendant:
Ronald O. Perelman and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ENGEL v. CLOUSE et al
as 2:2013cv07288
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ENGEL
Defendant:
EDWARD B. CLOUSE, II , JAMES L. GARDNER , ROBERT J. HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
IN RE PVR L.P. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 2:2013cv06829
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
PVR PARTNERS, L.P., PVR GP, LLC, WILLIAM H. SHEA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Rohit Prakash v. Altadis U.S.A., Inc., et al
as 12-3492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROHIT PRAKASH
Defendant - Appellee:
ALTADIS U.S.A., INC., ALTADIS HOLDINGS U.S.A., INC., CUBAN CIGAR BRANDS NV and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
