Cases 21 - 30 of 431
Barcliff et al v. City of New York
as 1:2022cv09762
Plaintiff:
Jackie Barcliff, Isaiah Charles, Jonathan Contreras and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Celli v. Engelmayer et al
as 1:2022cv06542
Plaintiff:
Lucio Celli
Defendant:
Judge Engelmayer, Judge Swain, Judge Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Tapia v. Driscoll et al
as 1:2022cv04210
Plaintiff:
Manuel Bolivar Perez Tapia
Defendant:
ICE Judge Robert P. Driscoll and Edilaine O. Telles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. USA
as 6:2022cv06288
Petitioner:
Nasir Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Suprina M. et al
as 2:2022cv02673
Plaintiff:
Terry Smith
Defendant:
P.O. Suprina M. and PO Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Deprospo et al
as 1:2022cv02866
Plaintiff:
Antonio Molina Perez
Defendant:
William L. Deprospo, Natasha Turner and David M. Hoovler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Miller
as 1:2022cv01464
Petitioner:
Julio Perez
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Annucci et al
as 6:2022cv06092
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Perez
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Jacqueline Mackey and Janice Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Terry Smith
Defendant:
John Doe, P.O. Suprina, P.O. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mojica v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv10504
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Mojica
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden of Metropolitan Correctional Center, Lieutenant Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
