Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Zhan Gao v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 07-2070
Petitioner:
ZHAN GAO
Respondent:
PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Charles Njinjoh v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-2058
Petitioner:
CHARLES BOBGA NJINJOH
Respondent:
PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Obafemi Opesanmi v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-2041
Petitioner:
OBAFEMI OLUSEUN OPESANMI
Respondent:
PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Aynalem Jino v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-2001
Petitioner:
AYNALEM MARKETY JINO
Respondent:
PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Pauline Matanga v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-1989
Petitioner:
PAULINE ATONGMBA MATANGA
Respondent:
PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Mian Ahmed v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-1933
Petitioner:
MIAN TAUGIR AHMED
Respondent:
PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Rony Albert v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-1925
Petitioner:
RONY ALBERT, a/k/a Ronny Albert
Respondent:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Kafayat Yusuff v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-1897
Petitioner:
KAFAYAT OLABISI YUSUFF
Respondent:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General, PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Samweil Saadalla v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-1871
Petitioner:
SAMWEIL MAZOUZ BASLIOUS SAADALLA
Respondent:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Divine Che v. Michael Mukasey
as 07-1857
Petitioner:
DIVINE AWAH CHE
Respondent:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General and MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Acting Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.