Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Peterson v. Exide Technologies
as 5:2009cv04122
Plaintiff:
Robert Peterson
Defendant:
Exide Technologies and Exide Technologies
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Peterson v. Cline et al
as 5:2009cv03164
Petitioner:
Andre L. Peterson
Respondent:
Sam Cline and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Thompson et al
as 2:2009cv02257
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Cook
Defendant:
Marvin Thompson, Marvin Thompson, Sonny Peterson Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kagy et al v. Mortgage Sources, Corp.
as 2:2008cv02660
Plaintiff:
Lisa Kagy, Lisa Kagy, Lisa Kagy and others
Defendant:
Mortgage Sources, Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson et al v. Moldofsky
as 2:2007cv02603
Plaintiff:
Piper Peterson, Piper Peterson, Piper Peterson and others
Defendant:
Michael Moldofsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Peterson v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02348
Plaintiff:
Max Paul Peterson
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Sinclair Oil Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gordon v. City of Hoisington, Kansas et al
as 5:2007cv03161
Plaintiff:
Willis Shane Gordon
Defendant:
City of Hoisington, Kansas, Jarod Shaw, Ron Svaty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Krueger v. Peterson
as 2:2007cv02035
Plaintiff:
Barbara Krueger
Defendant:
David W. Peterson, David W. Peterson and David W. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
