Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
FILED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv01219
Plaintiff:
Teresa Esrig, Mark Esrig and Unknown Persons
Defendant:
Torrent Pharmaceuticals LTD, Camber Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Las Cruces, New Mexico v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00336
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Las Cruces, New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Linville v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals Inc
as 5:2011cv01082
Plaintiff:
Tara Linville
Defendant:
Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
