Cases 41 - 50 of 244
Phelps v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00991
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Don Davis, R. Covey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17528
Plaintiff:
MARCUS PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHELPS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17273
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PHELPS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phelps v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00942
Petitioner:
Steven R. Phelps
Respondent:
Florida Department of Corrections, Florida Attorney General and Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phelps v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2022cv00881
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Phyail et al
as 5:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Terry Lavell Ingram
Defendant:
FNU Phyail, F. Perry, J. Idlerton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps et al v. Bedford et al
as 3:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps and Jamal Lee Bell
Defendant:
Officer Bedford, Sgt. or Officer Chism, L.T. Wendroff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Antionelli et al
as 5:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Terry Ingram
Defendant:
FNU Antionelli, FNU Phelps, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phelps et al v. Bennett et al
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps and Jamal Lee Bell
Defendant:
W.T. Bennett, C.A. Tyre, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sapp et al
as 3:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Lt. Sapp, Sgt. or Off. Pittman, Sgt. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
