Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Phelps v. ISOMEDIX OPERATIONS INC et al
as 1:2024cv03411
Plaintiff:
Hattie Phelps
Defendant:
ISOMEDIX OPERATIONS INC and COSMED GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Phelps v. Alegria et al
as 1:2024cv02851
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
A Alegria, T Berecz and J Guevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv02325
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Marquise Phelps
Defendant:
K. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M Phelps
Defendant:
. Smith, Mount Sterling Correctional Facility and ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv02025
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M Phelps
Defendant:
Smith, Mount Sterling Correctional Facility and ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Pringles et al
as 1:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Phelps
Defendant:
T Pringles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. 005 District Police et al
as 1:2023cv14472
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Phelps
Defendant:
005 District Police, Dela Huerta and T Pringles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11085
Plaintiff:
Carmen Phelps
Defendant:
Revlon Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Phelps v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07426
Plaintiff:
Cindy Phelps
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., LOreal USA, Inc., LOreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
