Cases 11 - 17 of 17
SALAMANTE et al v. QUINTEC INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv63310
Plaintiff:
EDGARDO R SALAMANTE, EDGARDO R SALAMANTE, EDGARDO R SALAMANTE and others
Defendant:
QUINTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., THOMAS DEE ENGINEERING COMPANY, 3M COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARRIS v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv90288
Plaintiff:
MARY ELLEN HARRIS and MARY ELLEN HARRIS
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, VIAD CORPORATION, VIAD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VAWTER et al v. ALFA LAVAL INC. et al
as 2:2008cv87203
Plaintiff:
JOHN W VAWTER, JOHN W VAWTER, ERNESTINE VAWTER and others
Defendant:
ALFA LAVAL INC., ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LUTZ et al v. PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv00397
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. LUTZ and CINDY LUTZ
Defendant:
PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and METLIFE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00142
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
ANDERSON v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63839
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ANNE ANDERSON, BARBARA ANNE ANDERSON, BARBARA ANNE ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
ALFA LAVAL, INC., BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARWOOD et al v. BONDEX INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63028
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN HARWOOD and JAMES HARWOOD
Defendant:
BONDEX INTERNATIONAL INC., BONDEX INTERNATIONAL INC., CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
