Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Hartley v. Jones et al
as 3:2015cv00609
Plaintiff:
Drew C Hartley
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones, Edwin Buss, Kenneth S Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkinson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2012cv80404
Plaintiff:
Reginald Wilkinson
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, The GEO Group, Inc., Enoch Ojukwu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lepeska Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv01105
Plaintiff:
Richard Kenneth Lepeska Jr.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, K. Minton, S. Moizuddin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrnes v. Scott et al
as 3:2011cv00604
Plaintiff:
David Jay Byrnes, Rule 23 and John/Jane Doe
Defendant:
Rick Scott, John/Jane Does, Randall C. Berg, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: bvcmp
Byrnes v. Scott et al
as 3:2011cv00507
Plaintiff:
David J. Byrnes
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Buzz Buss, Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MCNEIL
as 3:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARKIECE JACKSON
Defendant:
WALTER A MCNEIL, M NICHOLS, W D RUMMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Villacorta et al
as 2:2010cv14350
Plaintiff:
Ervin J. Thompson
Defendant:
Marta Villacorta, Reid Thomas, Walter A. McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Poveda et al
as 9:2010cv80979
Plaintiff:
Permon Thomas
Defendant:
Julio Poveda, Dena Tate, William Churchwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. McNeil et al
as 3:2010cv00688
Plaintiff:
Robert Karl George
Defendant:
Walter McNeil, Celeste Kemp, Pilar Tournay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
Marvin Davis, Elio Madan, William Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
