Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Yong K Hyung et al v. John Chungshin Kim et al
as 2:2011cv02825
Defendant:
American National Insurance Company, Does, John Chungshin Kim and others
Plaintiff:
California US Clothing Inc and Yong K Hyung
Ramon Mosqueda v. PMC Bancorp et al
as 2:2011cv02524
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance, CitiMortgage, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Mosqueda
Khem Lam et al v. PMC Bancorp et al
as 5:2011cv00165
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Svcs, PMC Bancorp and Qualilty Loan Svc Corp
Plaintiff:
Charrise Espiritu and Khem Lam
Chelsea Tae-Ryoung Park v. PMC Bancorp et al
as 2:2010cv07695
Defendant:
Chicago Title Company, Does, Mortgage Electronic Registration Sytems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Tae-Ryoung Park
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. v. PMC Bancorp
as 2:2010cv07207
Plaintiff:
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
PMC Bancorp
David Gomez v. Reconstruct Company, N.A. et al
as 2:2010cv04317
Defendant:
Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, DOES, PMC Bancorp and others
Plaintiff:
David Gomez
Ibrahim v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2010at00695
Plaintiff:
Mike Ibrahim
Defendant:
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Information Systems, Inc., , PMC Bancorp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Ibrahim v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01312
Plaintiff:
Mike Ibrahim
Defendant:
Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. , Mortgage Electronic Information Systems, Inc., , PMC Bancorp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Mayela Gutierrez et al v. Indymac FSB et al
as 2:2010cv00891
Defendant:
Does, Indymac FSB and PMC Bancorp
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Gutierrez and Mayela Gutierrez
Respondent:
Quality Loan Service Corporation
Chen et al v. PMC Bancorp et al
as 3:2009cv02704
Plaintiff:
Yueh Chen and Chen C. Wu
Defendant:
PMC Bancorp, 01Homeloan, One West Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
