Cases 1 - 10 of 635
Norman v. Praxair Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01071
Defendant:
Robert Tuttle, Praxair Inc. and Charles Haynes
Plaintiff:
Samantha Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osborne v. Praxair, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00382
Plaintiff:
William Osborne
Defendant:
Praxair, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osborne v. Praxair, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02524
Plaintiff:
William Osborne
Defendant:
Praxair, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Praxair,Inc. v. Risinger Bros. Transfer, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00397
Plaintiff:
Praxair, Inc
Defendant:
Risinger Bros. Transfer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones, Jr. et al v. Praxair, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00277
Plaintiff:
Freddie Jones, Jr. and Donnell C. Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
Praxair, Inc. and Anthony W. Crossley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teraoka, et al v. Air Liquide America Corporation et al
as 1:2007wf17092
Defendant:
Linde LLC, Deloro Stellite Company, Inc., Fibre-Metal Products Company and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce M. Teraoka and Charlotte Teraoka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McDougal v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17873
Defendant:
Deloro Stellite Company, Inc., John Doe, J.B. Alloy Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene McDougal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caudill et al v. Praxair, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00383
Plaintiff:
Jack Caudill and Barbara Caudill
Defendant:
Praxair, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Ginsberg et al v. A.O. Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2007wf17043
Defendant:
McDemott International Inc., Mary, Inc., Stoody Company and others
Plaintiff:
Irwin L. Ginsberg and Susan Ginsberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trinidad v. Air Liquide America Corporation et al
as 1:2007wf17112
Defendant:
Deloro Stellite Company, Inc., Fibre-Metal Products Company, Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Trinidad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
