Cases 1 - 10 of 16
PUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33721
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PUMPHREY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16825
Plaintiff:
BRAD RANDALL PUMPHREY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03939
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PUMPHREY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61525
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PUMPHREY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47707
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PUMPHREY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18364
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY PUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04259
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW T PUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FAULK v. WRIGHT et al
as 5:2020cv00270
Defendant:
WILLIAM L WRIGHT and CHRISTINA PUMPHREY
Plaintiff:
MARIO SANCHEZ FAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv86722
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RODDEUN PUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUMPHREY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17192
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE PUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
