Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Pacific Indemnity Company v. Consolidated Edison Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04367
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Consolidated Edison Inc., Consolidated Edison of New York Inc. and 775 Park Avenue, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
775 Park Avenue, Inc. and Consolidated Edison of New York Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Consolidated Edison Inc., Consolidated Edison of New York Inc. and 775 Park Avenue, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacific Indemnity Company v. Consolidated Edison Inc et al
as 1:2017cv04338
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Consolidated Edison Inc, Consolidated Edison of New York Inc and 775 Park Avenue Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacific Indemnity Company v. Consolidated Edison, Inc., et al.
as 1:2016cv01110
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Consolidated Edison, Inc., Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc. and 775 Park Avenue, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
775 Park Avenue, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacific Indemnity Company v. Smith et al
as 1:2012cv05837
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Timothy Smith, Cinemation, Inc. and System 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Insurance Company et al v. Mertz, Jr. et al
as 7:2012cv01597
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company , Great Northern Insurance Company and Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Paul H. Mertz, Jr., The Mertz Company and Dennis Sorge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pacific Indemnity Company v. Rayl et al
as 2:2009cv00037
Plaintiff:
Pacific Indemnity Company and Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Thomas P. Rayl and Rayl Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stevens et al v. Metso Paper et al
as 3:2007cv00735
Plaintiff:
Raymond Stevens and Pacific Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Metso Paper, USA Inc, Metso USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
