Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2016cv00200
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00353
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
v. SPIVEY et al DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE, FILE IN 7:16-cv-200
as 1:2016cv00197
Defendant:
BILL SPIVEY , JEH JOHNSON , LORETTA LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Nunez v. D. Ray James Correction Facility et al
as 5:2016cv00012
Petitioner:
Ricardo Padilla Nunez
Respondent:
D. Ray James Correction Facility, Tracy Johns, Geo Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Padilla v. Davis et al
as 1:2014cv03797
Petitioner:
Jorge Vasquez Padilla
Respondent:
Warren Davis, Daniel J. Porter, Jamie L. Smith, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PADILLA v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
as 4:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
BELINDA PADILLA
Defendant:
MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Padilla et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Noemi Padilla and Cesar Padilla
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Padilla et al
as 1:2011cv03900
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Juan Padilla and Mary Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ferrer v. JYM Contracting Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03210
Plaintiff:
Juan Pedro Padilla Ferrer and Juan Pedro Padilla Ferrer
Defendant:
JYM Contracting Services, Inc. and John Lopez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
Type:
Other Statutes
Padilla v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2009cv00171
Petitioner:
Mario Padilla
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Anthony Haynes, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
