Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Stephen Collins, et al v. Carnival PLC, et al
as 12-15215
:
In re: INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORTATION SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN COLLINS, NICHOLAS L. JENKINS, JOHN C. GORNIK and others
Claimant - Appellant:
CARNIVAL PLC
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., UAL CORP., AIR INDIA, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS, LTD. and BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC
Singleton v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv02106
Plaintiff:
Duane A. Singleton
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, R. Siaisiai, C. Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffory Weaver et al v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles Zeigler, Michael Herczeg, Thomas E Streeter and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Stephen Collins, et al v. Duncan Vere-Hopegood, et al
as 08-17477
:
In re: INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORTATION SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEPHEN COLLINS, NICHOLAS L. JENKINS, JOHN C. GORNIK and others
Appellant:
DUNCAN VERE-HOPEGOOD, DOMINIC HAGGER and TRACY HAGGER
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., UAL CORP., AIR INDIA, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS, LTD. and BRITISH AIWAYS, PLC
Stephen Collins, et al v. Vere-Hopegood, et al
as 08-17323
:
In re: INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORTATION SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEPHEN COLLINS, NICHOLAS L. JENKINS, JOHN C. GORNIK and others
Appellant:
DUNCAN VERE-HOPEGOOD, DOMINIC HAGGER and TRACY HAGGER
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., UAL CORP., AIR INDIA, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS, LTD. and BRITISH AIWAYS, PLC
Margaret Reed v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2005cv01103
Plaintiff:
Charles Zeigler, Michael Herczeg, Jeff Weaver and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
