Cases 1 - 10 of 95
James Ciesniewski v. Aries Capital Partners, Inc., et al
as 20-3451
Defendant / Appellee:
PARKER L. MOSS, P.C., PALISADES ACQUISITION XVI, LLC, PALISADES COLLECTION, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES A. CIESNIEWSKI, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03362
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ruppel v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03553
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ruppel
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. and Palisades Collection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CAMPBELL v. PALISADES COLLECTION, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01579
Plaintiff:
THEA CAMPBELL
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF PARKER L. MOSS, P.C. and PALISADES COLLECTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Oma Mandrell, et al
as 15-1121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
OMA L. MANDRELL, Estate of, deceased, SHERRY MANDRELL TAYLOR PORTER, PALISADES COLLECTION LLC and others
ELLIOTT v. PALISADES COLLECTION, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01067
Plaintiff:
PETER ELLIOTT
Defendant:
PALISADES COLLECTION, LLC and VATIV RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
