Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 329
Mueller v. Panasonic Corporation of North America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff: Walker Mueller
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00556
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Amguard Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corpoartion et al
as 8:2023cv01105
Plaintiff: AmGuard Insurance Company
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation, Lowes Home Centers LLC, Panasonic Corporation of North America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Property Damage
Amguard Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corpoartion et al
as 2:2023cv04757
Plaintiff: Amguard Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation licensed to do business in California, as Subrogee of Shane Wallance and Heather Wallace, as individuals, and AmGuard Insurance Company
Defendant: Whirlpool Corporation, Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, Panasonic Corporation of North America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Property Damage
Wettstein and Sons, Inc. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01882
Defendant: Samsung SDI Co Ltd, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd, Tatung Company of America Inc and others
Plaintiff: Wettstein and Sons, Inc on behlaf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Wettstein's
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Bonsignore Trial Lawyers, LLC, et al
as 22-16678
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION and CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellee: BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, LLC, GRAY ECHAVARRIA, GLORIA COMEAUX and others
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16534
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16532
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, LLC, GRAY ECHAVARRIA and GLORIA COMEAUX
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16537
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00435
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?