Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Williams v. Commandant et al
as 5:2020cv03273
Respondent:
United States Navy Clemency and Parole Board, Commandant and Christopher Moyer
Petitioner:
Robert P. Williams, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spight v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2020cv03081
Defendant:
Kansas Parole Board, James Heimgartner and Michelle Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Gregory Spight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv03053
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Pool v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 5:2019cv03252
Petitioner:
Terry Pool
Respondent:
U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Maier (ID 104561) v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv03196
Defendant:
Enforcement, Apprehension and Investigation, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Parole Board and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coty Maier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradin v. Thomas et al
as 5:2019cv03041
Petitioner:
John Bradin
Respondent:
Linda Thomas and United States Board of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Micheaux v. Sedgwick County Parole Office et al
as 5:2018cv03010
Petitioner:
Codee Micheaux
Respondent:
Sedgwick County Parole Office, Amanda Woods and Kylee Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parrish-Parrado (ID 25121) v. Langford et al
as 5:2017cv03144
Petitioner:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado and Kishen Leroy Woods
Respondent:
Don Langford, L. Stanley, Rural Larned Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rydberg v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 5:2016cv03242
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Rydberg
Defendant:
South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles, Myron Rau and Ed Lightenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
