Cases 71 - 80 of 177
Park v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Thomas Alan Park
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Fred Sutton
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byers v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
Brett D. Byers
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnham v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Burnham
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Anthel LaVan Brown
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hamilton
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dillard Cody Miller
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Gurney Lee Garrett
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Wells
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Parole Board Director et al
as 6:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
James Stewart
Defendant:
Parole Board Director, Parole Board Member and Ed Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
