Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Walker v. McMahon et al
as 1:2020cv05982
Defendant:
Joseph H. McMahon, Jody P. Gleason and Patrick B. Perez
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Kramer et al
as 1:2015cv05862
Plaintiff:
George Padilla
Defendant:
Donald E Kramer, Patrick B. Perez, C. Hunger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kellogg v. Kane County Sheriff et al
as 1:2014cv10300
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kellogg
Defendant:
Kane County Sheriff, Patrick B. Perez, Kane County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. Perez et al
as 1:2014cv10037
Plaintiff:
Sammie Lamart Booker
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, C/O Ryder, C/O Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Perez et al
as 1:2014cv07519
Plaintiff:
Moses Ramirez
Defendant:
Patrick B. Perez, Kane County Adult Justice Center, Medical Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Kane County Adult Judicial Center et al
as 1:2014cv02242
Plaintiff:
Douglas K. Powell
Defendant:
Kane County Adult Judicial Center, Patrick B. Perez and Aramark Commissary Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. Carter et al
as 1:2013cv09267
Plaintiff:
Robert Robinson and Arturo Terrell
Defendant:
Wayne Carter, Corey Hunger and Patrick B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Kane County Jail et al
as 1:2013cv08976
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Kelly
Defendant:
Kane County Jail, Patrick B. Perez and Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kellogg v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv01262
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kellogg
Defendant:
Ken Johnson, Patrick B Perez and Kane County Sheriff's Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kellogg v. Johnson et al
as 1:2013cv04335
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kellogg
Defendant:
Ken Johnson, Patrick B. Perez and Kane County Sheriff's Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
