Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SKINNER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19363
Plaintiff:
PAUL MCSKIN SKINNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Skinner v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv00019
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Petitioner:
Paul A. Skinner
Unknown:
Catherine Cortez-Masto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skinner v. Smith et al
as 3:2012cv00271
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Warden Greg Smith
Petitioner:
Paul A. Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Skinner v. Smith, et al
as 3:2011cv00207
Defendant:
Tania Arguello, James Baca, Tony Podestra and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner v. USA
as 1:2009cv00739
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Paul D. Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
In Re: Royal Dutch/Shell Trans, et al, et al
as 08-4346
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PA PUB SCH EMPL RET SYS and PA STATE EMPL RET SYS
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ALALA, THOMAS BENNETT, III, BETTY BINDER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NV KONINKLIJKE KNP BT, SHELL TRANSP TRADING, SHELL PETRO NV and others
Defendant:
MALCOLM BRINDED, S. L. MILLER, M. MOODY-STUART and others
Not Party - Appellant:
DANIEL R. STOLZER and MELISSA A. OST ROLLOVER IRA
In Re: Royal Dutch/Shell Trans, et al, et al
as 08-4153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PA PUB SCH EMPL RET SYS, PA STATE EMPL RET SYS, JOHN BROCKAMP and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT FAUSTINO RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
NV KONINKLIJKE KNP BT, SHELL TRANSP TRADING, SHELL PETRO NV and others
Defendant:
MALCOLM BRINDED, S. L. MILLER, M. MOODY-STUART and others
Employers Insurance Company of Wausau v. Skinner
as 2:2007cv00735
Plaintiff:
Employers Insurance Company of Wausau and Employers Insurance Company of Wausau
Defendant:
Paul A. Skinner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
