Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Apex Midwest
as 4:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund and Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund
Defendant:
Apex Midwest
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v D.E. Martin Roofing Co Inc.
as 4:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund and Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund
Defendant:
D.E. Martin Roofing Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. CMT Roofing, LLC
as 4:2016cv00087
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund and Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund
Defendant:
CMT Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 181 et al v. KIP A. STAUB CO. LLC
as 3:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 181, TRUSTEES OF THE CENTRAL PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 181 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
KIP A. STAUB CO. LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Jourdain Roofing Company
as 2:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund and Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Jourdain Roofing Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. CMT Roofing, LLC
as 4:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund and Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund
Defendant:
CMT Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund Trustees of the et al v. TAG Coatings Corp
as 4:2014cv00044
Plaintiff:
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health & Welfare Fund Trustees of the and Local Union No 2 United Union of Roofers Waterproofers Supplemental Pension Fund
Defendant:
TAG Coatings Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund Trustees of the et al v. Greg Glandt Roofing Inc.
as 4:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund and Indiana State Council of Roofers Health & Welfare Fund Trustees of the
Defendant:
Greg Glandt Roofing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
JF New & Associates Inc v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO et al
as 3:2014cv01418
Plaintiff:
JF New & Associates Inc
Defendant:
Local 150 International Union of Operating Engineers AFL-CIO, Railroad Maintenance and Industrial Health and Welfare Fund The, Midwest Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Fund The and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. TAG Coatings Corp
as 4:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund and Local No 2 Trustees of the United Union of Roofers Waterproofers and Allied Workers Union Supplemental Pension Fund
Defendant:
TAG Coatings Corp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
