Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Merino-Tapia v. Penske Truck Leasing Co LP et al
as 5:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anselma Merino-Tapia
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Co LP and Frank D Boswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Porter v. Myers et al
as 1:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Michael Porter
Defendant:
Cory Allen Myers, Huttig Building Products, INC. and Penske Truck Leasing Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Shaw et al v. Brink's Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00636
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Shaw and Peggy Oneal Shaw
Defendant:
Brink's Incorporated and Penske Truck Leasing Co LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ellis v. Sanchez et al
as 7:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Bernabe ramiro Sanchez, Royal Express Inc and Penske Truck Leasing Corporation
Plaintiff:
D'Andrea Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duke v. Moquin et al
as 1:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
Walter E. Duke
Defendant:
Eric Gregory Moquin and Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Aramark Uniform and Carreer Apparel LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01349
Plaintiff:
Chanell Turner
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform and Carreer Apparel LLC , Penske Truck Leasing Co and John Wilson Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caldwell v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Dora Caldwell
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel LLC , Penske Truck Leasing Co LP and John Wilson Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pickett et al v. ARAMARK Services Inc
as 2:2017cv01282
Plaintiff:
Marlo Pickett and Jase Newell
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel LLC , Penske Truck Leasing Co LP and John Wilson Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanchez et al v. Knight et al
as 1:2011cv00863
Plaintiff:
Ruben Dario Sanchez and Kenwin Stuckey
Defendant:
Leroy Knight, Jr. , Old Castle Building Envelope, Inc. and Penske Truck Leasing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
