Cases 1 - 6 of 6
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, et al v. Lawrence Tabak, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Madeline Krasno and Ryan Hartkopf
Defendant / Appellee:
Lawrence A. Tabak, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the National Institutes of Health and Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS et al v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2021cv02380
Plaintiff:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, MADELINE KRASNO and RYAN HARTKOPF
Defendant:
FRANCIS M. COLLINS and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. et al v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2021cv00968
Defendant:
KEVIN SHEA and TOM VILSACK
Plaintiff:
EVANNA LYNCH, MARTIN WASSERMAN, PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2017cv01598
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION , FEMHEALTH USA, INC , MILO WORLDWIDE LLC and others
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and PAUL J. WIEDEFELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
People Ethical v. Gittens, Anthony, et al
as 03-7195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony Gittens, Executive Director, District of Columbia Commission on the Arts and Humanities and District of Columbia
PETA v. Gittens, Anthony, et al
as 02-7106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony Gittens, Executive Director, District of Columbia Commission on the Arts and Humanities and District of Columbia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
