Cases 1 - 9 of 9
P Poe 5, et al. v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., et al.
as 24-2765
Plaintiff:
P POE 5 and P POES, 2 through 4 and 6 through 75, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings at the University of Washington
Intervenor:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. and NORTHWEST ANIMAL RIGHTS NETWORK
Jane Sullivan, et al v. University of Washington, et al
as 23-35313
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE SULLIVAN and P. POES, 1-75; Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings, University of Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CALIFORNIANS AWARE, FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Metro. Transportation Authority
as 23-55145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Metro. Transportation Authority
as 23-55115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Jane Sullivan, et al v. University of Washington, et al
as 22-35338
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE SULLIVAN and P. POES, 1-75; Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings, University of Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, 16 MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS and ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Naruto v. David Slater, et al
as 16-15469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NARUTO, a Crested Macaque, by and through his Next Friends, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and ANTJE ENGELHARDT, Ph.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID JOHN SLATER, BLURB, INC., a Delaware corporation and WILDLIFE PERSONALITIES, LTD., a United Kingdom private limited company
Amicus Curiae:
AGUSTIN FUENTES, Primatalogist, Macaque expert, and Professor of Anthropology
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
ALDF, et al v. Lawrence Wasden
as 15-35960
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF IDAHO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Idaho
Amicus Curiae:
PLANT BASED FOODS ASSOCIATION, IDAHO BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL, FOOD LAW & POLICY SCHOLARS and others
People for the Ethical Treatme, et al v. United States Fish & Wildlife, et al
as 14-55471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC and ANIMAL DEFENDERS INTERNATIONAL, INC., U.S.
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
FELD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and SALLY JEWELL, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Shelby Proie, et al v. National Marine Fisheries Serv, et al
as 12-35433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELBY PROIE, KAREN MUNRO, PATRICIA SYKES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, SAMUEL D RAUCH, III, in his official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Fisheries of the National Marine Fisheries Service and JOHN BRYSON, in his official capacity as the Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
MARINE EXHIBITION CORPORATION, DBA Miami Seaquarium
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
