Cases 1 - 10 of 10
REESE v. NEW BERN TRANSPORT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv04412
Plaintiff:
JESSICA REESE
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC. and SHAWN DAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv03918
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SOX v. MCLANE NEW JERSEY, INC. et al
as 5:2015cv05655
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SOX
Defendant:
MCLANE NEW JERSEY, INC. , MCLANE COMPANY, INC. , MCLANE/MID-ATLANTIC, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
DEDICATED MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Cross_defendant:
MAT BOWEN , ROBERT BURRUS , RUSSELL GORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
KOCHMANSKY v. ACME MARKETS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05481
Plaintiff:
LISA KOCHMANSKY
Defendant:
ACME MARKETS, INC. , PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY, PEPSICO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWER RESTORATION INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. PEPSICO, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01922
Plaintiff:
POWER RESTORATION INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
PEPSICO, INC. , BOTTLING GROUP, LLC and FRITO-LAY TRADING COMPANY (EUROPE), GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAMONE et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00892
Plaintiff:
SANDRA SALAMONE and JOHN SALAMONE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., PEPSICO, INC. and THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HOPPLE v. GENUARDI'S FAMILY MARKETS, L.P. et al
as 2:2008cv04576
Plaintiff:
LAURA HOPPLE
Defendant:
GENUARDI'S FAMILY MARKETS, L.P., SAFEWAY, INC., PEPSI-COLA FOUNTAIN COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
