Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Rodriguez-Perez v. Neven et al
as 2:2019cv00939
Defendant:
Patterson, Herrera, McCarter and others
Plaintiff:
Aurora Rodriguez-Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Baker et al
as 3:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Baker, Perez, Link and others
Plaintiff:
James Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Marquez v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez-Marquez
Defendant:
Pickett M. Hubbard, Eldon K. McDaniels, Kay Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
as 2:2018cv02077
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Joseph Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00379
Defendant:
Dr. K. Gedney, Warden Brian Williams, Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Williams et al
as 2:2018cv01394
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
Jose Sanchez-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez-Perez v. Neven et al
as 2:2018cv00535
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Neven
Petitioner:
Aurora Rodriguez-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Ruiz v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00635
Defendant:
Renee Baker, George Gonzales, James Keener and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Perez-Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Baker et al
as 3:2017cv00538
Respondent:
Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Noe Ortega Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Marquez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02335
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez-Marquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
